
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Member of
Syndicate 0044
for the year ended 31 December 2024
CMA
Syndicate 0044 Annual Report & Accounts 31 December 2024
Page 9 of 36
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual accounts
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual accounts as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate annual accounts.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The
risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or
intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed
below. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both
those charged with governance of the managing agent and management.
Our approach was as follows:
•
We obtained a general understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable
to the syndicate and determined that the most significant are direct laws and regulations related
to elements of Lloyd’s Byelaws and Regulations, and the financial reporting framework (UK
GAAP), and requirements referred to by Lloyd’s in the Syndicate Accounts instructions. Our
considerations of other laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the syndicate
annual accounts included permissions and supervisory requirements of Lloyd’s of London, the
Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’) and the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’).
•
We obtained a general understanding of how the syndicate is complying with those frameworks
by making enquiries of management, internal audit, and those responsible for legal and
compliance matters of the syndicate. In assessing the effectiveness of the control environment,
we also reviewed significant correspondence between the syndicate, Lloyd’s of London and other
UK regulatory bodies; reviewed minutes of the Board and the Audit Committee of the managing
agent; and gained an understanding of the managing agent’s appr
oach to governance.
•
For direct laws and regulations, we considered the extent of compliance with those laws and
regulations as part of our procedures on the related syndicate annual accounts’ items.
•
For both direct and other laws and regulations, our procedures involved: making enquiries of the
directors of the managing agent and senior management for their awareness of any non-
compliance of laws or regulations, enquiring about the policies that have been established to
prevent non-compliance with laws and regulations by officers and employees, enquiring about
the managing agent’s methods of enforcing and monitoring compliance with such policies, and
inspecting significant correspondence with Lloyd’s, the FCA and the PRA.
•
The syndicate operates in the insurance industry which is a highly regulated environment. As
such the Senior Statutory Auditor considered the experience and expertise of the engagement
team to ensure that the team had the appropriate competence and capabilities, which included
the use of specialists where appropriate.
•
We assessed the susceptibility of the syndicate’s annual accounts to material misstatement,
including how fraud might occur by considering the controls that the managing agent has
established to address risks identified by the managing agent, or that otherwise seek to prevent,
deter or detect fraud. We also considered areas of significant judgement, and the impact these