
Independent auditor’s report to the members of
Syndicate 0457 (continued)
31 December 2024
21
In preparing the syndicate annual accounts, the managing agent is responsible for assessing
the syndicate’s ability to continue in operation, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to its
ability to continue in operation and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the
managing agent either intends to cease to operate the syndicate, or has no realistic alternative
but to do so.
Auditor’s
Responsibilities for the Audit of the Syndicate Annual Accounts
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual
accounts as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and
to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of
assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate
annual accounts.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We
design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities,
including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than
the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment
by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is
detailed below. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud
rests with both those charged with governance of the managing agent and management.
Our approach was as follows:
•
We obtained a general understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are
applicable to the syndicate and determined that the most significant are direct laws and
regulations related to elements of Lloyd’s Byelaws and Regulations, and the financial
reporting framework (UK GAAP), and requirements referred to by Lloyd’s in the Syndicate
Accounts instructions. Our considerations of other laws and regulations that may have a
material effect on the syndicate annual accounts included permissions and supervisory
requirements of Lloyd’s of London, the Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’) and the
Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’).
•
We obtained a general understanding of how the syndicate is complying with those
frameworks by making enquiries of management, internal audit, and those responsible
for legal and compliance matters of the syndicate. In assessing the effectiveness of the
control environment, we also reviewed significant correspondence between the syndicate,
Lloyd’s of London and other UK regulatory bodies; reviewed minutes of the Board and
Risk Committee of the managing agent; and gained an understanding of the managing
agent’s approach to governance.
•
For direct laws and regulations, we considered the extent of compliance with those laws
and regulations as part of our procedures on the related syndicate annual accounts’ items.
•
For both direct and other laws and regulations, our procedures involved: making enquiries
of the directors of the managing agent and senior management for their awareness of any
non-compliance of laws or regulations, enquiring about the policies that have been
established to prevent non-compliance with laws and regulations by officers and