
Notes to the financial statements –
(continued)
36
The Board of Directors approves the risk
management policies and meets regularly to
approve
any
commercial,
regulatory,
and
organisational requirements of such policies.
These policies define the identification of risk
and its interpretation to ensure the appropriate
quality and diversification of assets, align
underwriting and reinsurance strategy to the
Syndicate business plan, and specify reporting
requirements. Significant emphasis is placed on
assessment and documentation of risks and
controls, including the articulation of ‘risk
appetite’. The Syndicate regularly undertakes a
process known as ‘Own Risk & Solvency
Assessment’ (ORSA) which is reviewed by the
Risk Committee and finally approved by the
Board.
A. Insurance risk
The principal risk the Syndicate faces under
insurance contracts is that the actual claims and
benefit payments or the timing thereof, differ
from expectations. This is influenced by the
frequency of claims, severity of claims, actual
benefits paid and subsequent development of
long–term claims. Therefore, the objective of the
Syndicate is to ensure that sufficient reserves
are available to cover these liabilities.
The risk exposure is mitigated by diversification
across a portfolio of insurance contracts and
geographical areas. The variability of risks is
also
improved
by
careful
selection
and
implementation
of
underwriting
strategy
guidelines, as well as the use of reinsurance
arrangements.
The
Syndicate
assumes
business
from
Syndicate 1492 via a single quota share
agreement, which covers the following types of
general insurance contracts; Upstream Energy,
Marine and Energy Liability Ports and Terminal
Physical Damage and Cargo risks usually
covering twelve months’ duration.
The Syndicate’s most significant risks arise from
natural disasters.
Variability in claims and hence profits is a
significant risk to the Syndicate.
This is
mitigated by writing a diverse range of products
including diversification by industry sector and
geography.
The Syndicate has an agreed
maximum and normal line size for each
underwriting team.
It also has a reinsurance
strategy and purchasing plan to mitigate the
effects
of
individual
large
losses
and
events.
The pricing of the business includes the
consideration of inflation and other economic
factors.
Operational risk can also increase the
volatility of profits.
This risk is mitigated by strict
claim
handling
procedures
and
frequent
investigation of possible fraudulent claims.
PMA has a number of Board level risk appetite
statements governing the Syndicate's appetite
to
Insurance,
Reserving,
Investment
(and
Liquidity), Credit, and Operational Risks. These
are further sub-divided to provide greater clarity
to the business of the parameters within which it
is permitted to operate. One example is the
appetite for natural catastrophe risk, which is
expressed in terms of potential losses relative to
the reinsurance protections purchased, and
monitored using proprietary loss modelling tools.
The Syndicate uses commercially available
proprietary risk management software to assess
catastrophe exposure. However, there is always
a risk that the assumptions and techniques used
in these models are unreliable or that claims
arising from an un-modelled event are greater
than those arising from a modelled event.
Reserves have been assessed across the whole
underwriting portfolio on an entirely assumed
basis using the Lloyd’s approved Syndicate
business plan loss ratios.
The principal assumption underlying the liability
estimates is that the future claims development
will follow a similar pattern to past claims
development
experience.
This
includes
assumptions in respect of average claim costs,
claim handling costs, claim inflation factors and
claim numbers for each underwriting year.
Additional qualitative judgements are used to
assess the extent to which past trends may not
apply in the future, for example: one–off
occurrence; changes in market factors such as
public attitude to claiming: economic conditions:
as well as internal factors such as portfolio mix,
policy
conditions
and
claims
handling
procedures. Judgement is further used to