
Responsibilities of managing agent
As explained more fully in the managing agent’s responsibilities statement, the managing agent is responsible for the
preparation of the syndicate annual financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for
such internal control as the managing agent determines is necessary to enable the preparation of syndicate annual financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the syndicate annual financial statements, the managing agent is responsible for assessing the syndicate’s
ability to continue in operation, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to the syndicate’s ability to continue in operation
and to use the going concern basis of accounting unless the managing agent intends to cease the syndicate’s operations, or
has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs
(UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate annual financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual financial statements is located on the FRC’s
website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities
. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with
our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent
to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.
We considered the nature of the syndicate and its control environment, and reviewed the syndicate’s documentation of their
policies and procedures relating to fraud and compliance with laws and regulations. We also enquired of management, those
charged with governance, internal audit about their own identification and assessment of the risks of irregularities
.
We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that the syndicate operates in, and identified the key
laws and regulations that:
•
had a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. These included
the Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s Syndicate and Aggregate Accounts) Regulations 2008, the Lloyd’s
Syndicate Accounting Byelaw (no. 8 of 2005) and the Lloyd’s Syndicate Accounts Instructions; and
•
do not have a direct effect on the financial statements but compliance with which may be fundamental to the
syndicate’s ability to operate or to avoid a material penalty. These included the requirements of Solvency UK.
We discussed among the audit engagement team including relevant internal specialists such as actuarial and IT specialists
regarding the opportunities and incentives that may exist within the organisation for fraud and how and where fraud might
occur in the financial statements.
As a result of performing the above, we identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following areas, and our procedures
performed to address them are described below:
•
Valuation of certain IBNR technical provisions classes, including long tail classes, incorporates assumptions and
methodologies requiring significant management judgement and therefore there is potential for management bias
.
There is also a risk of overriding controls by making late adjustments to the technical provisions.
In response to these risks, we performed the following:
â—¦
Engaged our actuarial specialists to:
â–ª
challenge and assess the appropriateness of the methodology and assumptions used by the syndicate’s
actuarial function;
â–ª
carry out independent reserve estimations for selected classes of business; and
â–ª
perform benchmarking analysis for the development patterns for selected classes of business.
In support of the above work, we also tested the relevant controls around the data, models and assumptions used to
determine the syndicate’s reserves and tested the integrity of the data used in the actuarial calculations by agreeing it to the
underlying syndicate records. We also tested for late adjustments to the technical provisions.
AXIS SYNDICATE 2050
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SYNDICATE 2050
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________10