
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Syndicate 5886
(continued)
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud
(continued)
As a result of performing the above, we identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following
areas, and our procedures performed to address them are described below:
•
Estimation of pipeline premiums requires significant management judgement and
therefore there is potential for management bias through manipulation of core
assumptions. In response our testing included, for classes associated with significant
risk, on a sample basis, comparing management’s estimates on prior year policies
against actual premiums received as well as to historical experience on similar policies.
•
Valuation of technical provisions in relation to incurred but not reported claims (IBNR)
includes assumptions requiring significant management judgement and therefore there
is potential for management bias. There is also a risk of overriding controls by making
adjustments to the technical provisions. In response to these risks we involved our
actuarial specialists to develop independent estimates of the technical provisions for
classes associated with significant risk and we tested the adjustments made to
technical provisions outside of the normal reserving process. In addition, significant
management judgement is exercised in the valuation of Catastrophe IBNR reserves
given uncertainties in estimating claims emergence relating to event frequency,
,severity and data limitations. We assessed a sample of Catastrophe IBNR reserves
classified as significant risk by inspecting case documentation, challenging
management judgements, and performing benchmarking where possible.
In common with all audits under ISAs (UK), we are also required to perform specific procedures
to respond to the risk of management override. In addressing the risk of fraud through
management override of controls, we tested the appropriateness of journal entries and other
adjustments; assessed whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are
indicative of a potential bias; and evaluated the business rationale of any significant
transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.
In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to the risks identified included the following:
•
reviewing financial statement disclosures by testing to supporting documentation to
assess compliance with provisions of relevant laws and regulations described as
having a direct effect on the financial statements;
•
performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships
that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud;
•
enquiring of management and internal audit concerning actual and potential litigation
and claims, and instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations; and
•
reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance, reviewing internal audit
reports and
reviewing correspondence with Lloyd’s, PRA and FCA.
19