
Independent auditor’s report to the members of
Syndicate 0457 (continued)
31 December 2025
10
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual accounts
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual accounts
as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but
is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to
influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate annual accounts.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We
design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including
fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not
detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example,
forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is
detailed below. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests
with both those charged with governance of the managing agent and management.
Our approach was as follows:
x
We obtained a general understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are
applicable to the syndicate and determined that the most significant are direct laws and
regulations related to elements of Lloyd’s Byelaws and Regulations, and the financial reporting
framework (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice), and requirements
referred to by Lloyd’s in the Syndicate Accounts Instructions. Our considerations of other laws
and regulations that may have a material effect on the syndicate annual accounts included
permissions and supervisory requirements of Lloyd’s of London, the Prudential Regulation
Authority (‘PRA’) and the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’).
x
We obtained a general understanding of how the syndicate is complying with those
frameworks by making enquiries of management, internal audit, and those responsible for
legal and compliance matters of the syndicate. In assessing the effectiveness of the control
environment, we also reviewed significant correspondence between the syndicate, Lloyd’s of
London and other UK regulatory bodies; reviewed minutes of the Board and Audit Committee
of the managing agent; and gained an understanding of the managing agent’s approach to
governance.
x
For direct laws and regulations, we considered the extent of compliance with those laws and
regulations as part of our procedures on the related syndicate annual accounts’ items.
x
For both direct and other laws and regulations, our procedures involved: making enquiries of
the directors of the managing agent and senior management for their awareness of any non-
compliance of laws or regulations, enquiring about the policies that have been established to
prevent non-compliance with laws and regulations by officers and employees, enquiring about
the managing agent’s methods of enforcing and monitoring compliance with such policies,
and inspecting significant correspondence with Lloyd’s, the PRA and the FCA.
x
The syndicate operates in the insurance industry which is a highly regulated environment. As
such the Senior Statutory Auditor considered the experience and expertise of the engagement
team to ensure that the team had the appropriate competence and capabilities, which included
the use of specialists where appropriate.